11 Comments
Oct 5Liked by Matt Laslo

I appreciate all your hard work, Matt!

Expand full comment
Oct 5Liked by Matt Laslo

Thanks Matt - it's great that you interact with congress the way that you do so information flows both ways. i'm certain with the election many of the congress people have divided focus and your prompting helps keep things on their radar.

Expand full comment
Oct 5Liked by Matt Laslo

Eric Burlison isn't a hardcore believer on this topic, so I'm not surprised he seems to drop interest. Despite Grusch's claims validated by the IC Inspector General, Congress isn't very aware of them and neither is the public. I hope the next hearing really draws the attention this topic deserves, until then it will remain the game of cat and mouse.

Expand full comment

You failed to pressure him about his copy of the David Grusch op-ed. If he gives a goddamn about disclosure he should stand up on the floor of the House of Representatives and read it verbatim into the Congressional record.

Expand full comment
author

Totally forgot about that op-ed! It was never published?

Expand full comment

No, sir. 2.6 million subscribers of r/ufos would love to read it.

Expand full comment
founding
Oct 6Liked by Matt Laslo

Wait, Burly has a copy of DG’s op-ed?? Here I thought I was keeping up with everything out of ufo world😅

Expand full comment

Search Laslo's archived interviews with Burlison. It is documented there.

Expand full comment
Oct 5Liked by Matt Laslo

I’m pretty confident Burlison is just trolling this entire community at this point.

The NDAA amendments depend on who’s going to be president? Please. Eff off dude.

Expand full comment
Oct 5Liked by Matt Laslo

I was wondering what happened to Burlison. He did not even know that his colleagues had a UAP hearing already on the calendar? Whoa! Sounds like he lost interest in pursuing it. What a shame.

Expand full comment
author

Think communication in UAP Caucus is basically non existent, which could be due to election or…

Expand full comment