Saw that. Didn’t have time to update what I wrote last eve and didn’t publish - so didn’t review it (so embarrassed by typos…& app sucks for content creators…) and just hit send.
This directly contradicts other sources, including Grusch himself, and Nancy Mace, who you reported said: "So to get waivers for any witnesses that want to get into a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], would need a waiver on TS/SCI [top secret or sensitive compartmented information] clearance or to be able to do that. Even though they have their clearances, they would need a waiver from the Pentagon to get into a SCIF, so I put a request in for that."
Reading between the lines, it seems that the Pentagon is taking the position that it won't clear Grusch to testify because he doesn't have an active clearance (essentially, he's not cleared to hear himself speak).
Also, this sounds ridiculous on its face. 1. Between the Senate and the SOL Foundation, the idea that the resources don't exist to provide travel is not believable. 2. You mean to tell me that the US government hasn't perfected secure communications systems to transmit classified info?
Saw that. Didn’t have time to update what I wrote last eve and didn’t publish - so didn’t review it (so embarrassed by typos…& app sucks for content creators…) and just hit send.
Same with Gillibrand…
It worked out though! Got some interesting Grusch-related info out of it! 👍😅
Heads up, AFAIK, the House has scheduled a SCIF meeting with the ICIG and DoD IG, not Grusch himself.
I mean, is it just me, or does this sound absolutely absurd?
Right? I did a triple take.
She said that Dave lives in CA, but he lives in CO. Simple error. But I wonder how much she’s not working with the best most up-to-date info.
Right? Skeptical. Tho, letting truth trickle out at its own pace
This directly contradicts other sources, including Grusch himself, and Nancy Mace, who you reported said: "So to get waivers for any witnesses that want to get into a SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], would need a waiver on TS/SCI [top secret or sensitive compartmented information] clearance or to be able to do that. Even though they have their clearances, they would need a waiver from the Pentagon to get into a SCIF, so I put a request in for that."
Reading between the lines, it seems that the Pentagon is taking the position that it won't clear Grusch to testify because he doesn't have an active clearance (essentially, he's not cleared to hear himself speak).
Also, this sounds ridiculous on its face. 1. Between the Senate and the SOL Foundation, the idea that the resources don't exist to provide travel is not believable. 2. You mean to tell me that the US government hasn't perfected secure communications systems to transmit classified info?
Is she lying to you?
All politicians lie. I let em then trap em when time is right....