8 Comments

Haha beautiful timing:) And what’s with ‘fulsome’ getting thrown around these days lol. That was in Monheims response to Burchette et al. Either way Warner seems quite uncomfortable finding the right words ...

The context you added in the transcription is great, thx for that, Matt.

Also, Sen Warner saying that this is the first time the fed gov has put this many resources behind this issue is kinda silly? I mean, Project Sign, Grudge, Bluebook etc. Did I miss something?

Great stuff, Matt! 🙏🤘

Expand full comment

Thanks!

And, yeah, why these kids need the light of day shone on em!

Expand full comment

He was speaking a word every two seconds haha. Like he had to think reaaaaally hard about what he wanted to say 😂

Expand full comment

Welcome to my world. hahaha

Expand full comment

Nice!

Make sure every senator/representative is aware of what could happen with the UAP measures in the NDAA!

Turner, who is behind the push to remove that legislation, has baselessly attacked former pilots and officials.

https://townhall.com/columnists/johnnantz/2023/09/26/government-weaponization-accountability-and-the-uap-question-n2628933

Expand full comment

Great work. 💪

Expand full comment

Any insight into whether he and Rubio are aligned in shutting down public Senate hearings?

Expand full comment

See Gillibrand and Warner deny that to us? Was just a rumor. Warner doesn't have that power.

Now Schumer or Pentagon may...exploring that...

Expand full comment