The Ecosystemic Futures podcast had an episode titled, "Beyond Paradigms: Ultra-Advanced Technologies, Anomalous Phenomena, and the Future of Innovation" in which Puthoff and Graves are both guests. They give a great discussion on advanced physics and UAP, but the real bombshell is dropped at the 6:43 mark by one of the co-hosts, Larry Forsley, who states,
"Last November 3rd, there was a meeting held at the Senate by the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees looking at 3 topics: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions or Lattice Confinement Fusion, extended electrodynamics, which is basically taking what we all love with Maxwell's equations and then correcting some pieces that seem to have been left out and then last, the role of UAP's. And the consideration for the meeting was that the power source that UAP use may very well be something like lattice confinement fusion and that the potential electro-gravitics as applied to propulsion - how they get around - so there is an overlap there. Subsequent to that meeting we had another one on December 8th and we submitted a proposal to explore this between NASA and the US Navy."
Might be a topic to discuss with the pols in that meeting?
Does Rep. Burchett have any evidence that China is any way involved with the drones? Or is this like Rep. Van Drew’s version of the Iranian mothership?
Did you know????
The Ecosystemic Futures podcast had an episode titled, "Beyond Paradigms: Ultra-Advanced Technologies, Anomalous Phenomena, and the Future of Innovation" in which Puthoff and Graves are both guests. They give a great discussion on advanced physics and UAP, but the real bombshell is dropped at the 6:43 mark by one of the co-hosts, Larry Forsley, who states,
"Last November 3rd, there was a meeting held at the Senate by the Armed Services and Intelligence Committees looking at 3 topics: Low Energy Nuclear Reactions or Lattice Confinement Fusion, extended electrodynamics, which is basically taking what we all love with Maxwell's equations and then correcting some pieces that seem to have been left out and then last, the role of UAP's. And the consideration for the meeting was that the power source that UAP use may very well be something like lattice confinement fusion and that the potential electro-gravitics as applied to propulsion - how they get around - so there is an overlap there. Subsequent to that meeting we had another one on December 8th and we submitted a proposal to explore this between NASA and the US Navy."
Might be a topic to discuss with the pols in that meeting?
Does Rep. Burchett have any evidence that China is any way involved with the drones? Or is this like Rep. Van Drew’s version of the Iranian mothership?