Who?
Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI) — Chair, House Oversight National Security, the Border, & Foreign Affairs Subcommittee
Background: Grothman chaired David Grusch hearing
Ask a Pol asks:
What do you think of members of the Congressional UAP Caucus asking for a new UAP Subcommittee?
Key Grothman:
“I think we’re gonna hold another hearing in the subcommittee, so that really won't be necessary,” Grothman exclusively told Ask a Pol. “It’s unneeded ’cause, we’ve held a bunch of, not hearings, but briefings in the SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], and we’re gonna do some others. We’re not done with it.”
LISTEN: Laslo & Grothman (3-20-2024)
Caught our ear:
“We’re not done with it.”
ICYMI
SUBSCRIBER-ONLY CONTENT*
*Student? Lost your gig? Hard times? Been there. Got you. No questions asked. Just ping us.
Below find a rough transcript of Ask a Pol’s exclusive interview with Rep. Glenn Grothman (R-WI), slightly edited for clarity.
TRANSCRIPT: Rep. Glenn Grothman
SCENE: With sirens blaring in the background, Grothman walks across the Capitol grounds back to his office after voting on the floor of the US House of Representatives.
Matt Laslo: “Have you seen that letter in your committee for a — asking for a select UAP Subcommittee?”
Glenn Grothman: “Oh, we might — I think we’re gonna hold another hearing in the subcommittee, so that really won't be necessary.”
ML: “Oh yeah? Like, what do you think of their ask for another subcommittee? Just redundant, not needed?”
GG: “It’s unneeded ’cause, we’ve held a bunch of, not hearings, but briefings in the SCIF [Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility], and we’re gonna do some others. We’re not done with it.”
ML: “Not done with it?”
Grothman nods.
ML: “I’ll be watching sir. As always, ’preciate ya.”
GG: “Thank you.”
Share this post